4 Bakara

4.1 Continuous

4.1.1 elev

Figure 4.1 shows rasters for elev in the Bakara area.

Table 4.2 shows boxplots for each decile of elev, allowing a comparison of values within each DEM across different ranges of elev. Deciles are based on the values in the reference DEM: Ag.

Figure 4.3 shows the a distribution of values for each sample DEM and window size.

Figure 4.4 shows the distribution of differences between the reference DEM and the other DEMs.

Figure 4.1: elev raster for each DEM


Range of values within deciles for each DEM. Deciles are taken from the reference DEM

Figure 4.2: Range of values within deciles for each DEM. Deciles are taken from the reference DEM


Distribution of elev values in each DEM: Bakara

Figure 4.3: Distribution of elev values in each DEM: Bakara


Distribution of difference between each DEM and reference for elev values: Bakara

Figure 4.4: Distribution of difference between each DEM and reference for elev values: Bakara

4.1.2 qslope

Figure 4.5 shows rasters for qslope in the Bakara area.

Table 4.6 shows boxplots for each decile of qslope, allowing a comparison of values within each DEM across different ranges of qslope. Deciles are based on the values in the reference DEM: Ag.

Figure 4.7 shows the a distribution of values for each sample DEM and window size.

Figure 4.8 shows the distribution of differences between the reference DEM and the other DEMs.

Figure 4.5: qslope raster for each DEM


Range of values within deciles for each DEM. Deciles are taken from the reference DEM

Figure 4.6: Range of values within deciles for each DEM. Deciles are taken from the reference DEM


Distribution of qslope values in each DEM: Bakara

Figure 4.7: Distribution of qslope values in each DEM: Bakara


Distribution of difference between each DEM and reference for qslope values: Bakara

Figure 4.8: Distribution of difference between each DEM and reference for qslope values: Bakara

4.1.3 qaspect

Figure 4.9 shows rasters for qaspect in the Bakara area.

Table 4.10 shows boxplots for each decile of qaspect, allowing a comparison of values within each DEM across different ranges of qaspect. Deciles are based on the values in the reference DEM: Ag.

Figure 4.11 shows the a distribution of values for each sample DEM and window size.

Figure 4.12 shows the distribution of differences between the reference DEM and the other DEMs.

Figure 4.9: qaspect raster for each DEM


Range of values within deciles for each DEM. Deciles are taken from the reference DEM

Figure 4.10: Range of values within deciles for each DEM. Deciles are taken from the reference DEM


Distribution of qaspect values in each DEM: Bakara

Figure 4.11: Distribution of qaspect values in each DEM: Bakara


Distribution of difference between each DEM and reference for qaspect values: Bakara

Figure 4.12: Distribution of difference between each DEM and reference for qaspect values: Bakara

4.1.4 qeastness

Figure 4.13 shows rasters for qeastness in the Bakara area.

Table 4.14 shows boxplots for each decile of qeastness, allowing a comparison of values within each DEM across different ranges of qeastness. Deciles are based on the values in the reference DEM: Ag.

Figure 4.15 shows the a distribution of values for each sample DEM and window size.

Figure 4.16 shows the distribution of differences between the reference DEM and the other DEMs.

Figure 4.13: qeastness raster for each DEM


Range of values within deciles for each DEM. Deciles are taken from the reference DEM

Figure 4.14: Range of values within deciles for each DEM. Deciles are taken from the reference DEM


Distribution of qeastness values in each DEM: Bakara

Figure 4.15: Distribution of qeastness values in each DEM: Bakara


Distribution of difference between each DEM and reference for qeastness values: Bakara

Figure 4.16: Distribution of difference between each DEM and reference for qeastness values: Bakara

4.1.5 qnorthness

Figure 4.17 shows rasters for qnorthness in the Bakara area.

Table 4.18 shows boxplots for each decile of qnorthness, allowing a comparison of values within each DEM across different ranges of qnorthness. Deciles are based on the values in the reference DEM: Ag.

Figure 4.19 shows the a distribution of values for each sample DEM and window size.

Figure 4.20 shows the distribution of differences between the reference DEM and the other DEMs.

Figure 4.17: qnorthness raster for each DEM


Range of values within deciles for each DEM. Deciles are taken from the reference DEM

Figure 4.18: Range of values within deciles for each DEM. Deciles are taken from the reference DEM


Distribution of qnorthness values in each DEM: Bakara

Figure 4.19: Distribution of qnorthness values in each DEM: Bakara


Distribution of difference between each DEM and reference for qnorthness values: Bakara

Figure 4.20: Distribution of difference between each DEM and reference for qnorthness values: Bakara

4.1.6 TPI

Figure 4.21 shows rasters for TPI in the Bakara area.

Table 4.22 shows boxplots for each decile of TPI, allowing a comparison of values within each DEM across different ranges of TPI. Deciles are based on the values in the reference DEM: Ag.

Figure 4.23 shows the a distribution of values for each sample DEM and window size.

Figure 4.24 shows the distribution of differences between the reference DEM and the other DEMs.

Figure 4.21: TPI raster for each DEM


Range of values within deciles for each DEM. Deciles are taken from the reference DEM

Figure 4.22: Range of values within deciles for each DEM. Deciles are taken from the reference DEM


Distribution of TPI values in each DEM: Bakara

Figure 4.23: Distribution of TPI values in each DEM: Bakara


Distribution of difference between each DEM and reference for TPI values: Bakara

Figure 4.24: Distribution of difference between each DEM and reference for TPI values: Bakara

4.1.7 TRI

Figure 4.25 shows rasters for TRI in the Bakara area.

Table 4.26 shows boxplots for each decile of TRI, allowing a comparison of values within each DEM across different ranges of TRI. Deciles are based on the values in the reference DEM: Ag.

Figure 4.27 shows the a distribution of values for each sample DEM and window size.

Figure 4.28 shows the distribution of differences between the reference DEM and the other DEMs.

Figure 4.25: TRI raster for each DEM


Range of values within deciles for each DEM. Deciles are taken from the reference DEM

Figure 4.26: Range of values within deciles for each DEM. Deciles are taken from the reference DEM


Distribution of TRI values in each DEM: Bakara

Figure 4.27: Distribution of TRI values in each DEM: Bakara


Distribution of difference between each DEM and reference for TRI values: Bakara

Figure 4.28: Distribution of difference between each DEM and reference for TRI values: Bakara

4.1.8 TRIriley

Figure 4.29 shows rasters for TRIriley in the Bakara area.

Table 4.30 shows boxplots for each decile of TRIriley, allowing a comparison of values within each DEM across different ranges of TRIriley. Deciles are based on the values in the reference DEM: Ag.

Figure 4.31 shows the a distribution of values for each sample DEM and window size.

Figure 4.32 shows the distribution of differences between the reference DEM and the other DEMs.

Figure 4.29: TRIriley raster for each DEM


Range of values within deciles for each DEM. Deciles are taken from the reference DEM

Figure 4.30: Range of values within deciles for each DEM. Deciles are taken from the reference DEM


Distribution of TRIriley values in each DEM: Bakara

Figure 4.31: Distribution of TRIriley values in each DEM: Bakara


Distribution of difference between each DEM and reference for TRIriley values: Bakara

Figure 4.32: Distribution of difference between each DEM and reference for TRIriley values: Bakara

4.1.9 TRIrmsd

Figure 4.33 shows rasters for TRIrmsd in the Bakara area.

Table 4.34 shows boxplots for each decile of TRIrmsd, allowing a comparison of values within each DEM across different ranges of TRIrmsd. Deciles are based on the values in the reference DEM: Ag.

Figure 4.35 shows the a distribution of values for each sample DEM and window size.

Figure 4.36 shows the distribution of differences between the reference DEM and the other DEMs.

Figure 4.33: TRIrmsd raster for each DEM


Range of values within deciles for each DEM. Deciles are taken from the reference DEM

Figure 4.34: Range of values within deciles for each DEM. Deciles are taken from the reference DEM


Distribution of TRIrmsd values in each DEM: Bakara

Figure 4.35: Distribution of TRIrmsd values in each DEM: Bakara


Distribution of difference between each DEM and reference for TRIrmsd values: Bakara

Figure 4.36: Distribution of difference between each DEM and reference for TRIrmsd values: Bakara

4.1.10 roughness

Figure 4.37 shows rasters for roughness in the Bakara area.

Table 4.38 shows boxplots for each decile of roughness, allowing a comparison of values within each DEM across different ranges of roughness. Deciles are based on the values in the reference DEM: Ag.

Figure 4.39 shows the a distribution of values for each sample DEM and window size.

Figure 4.40 shows the distribution of differences between the reference DEM and the other DEMs.

Figure 4.37: roughness raster for each DEM


Range of values within deciles for each DEM. Deciles are taken from the reference DEM

Figure 4.38: Range of values within deciles for each DEM. Deciles are taken from the reference DEM


Distribution of roughness values in each DEM: Bakara

Figure 4.39: Distribution of roughness values in each DEM: Bakara


Distribution of difference between each DEM and reference for roughness values: Bakara

Figure 4.40: Distribution of difference between each DEM and reference for roughness values: Bakara

4.2 Categorical

Table 4.1 shows the proportion of each DEM classifed to each landform element (also see Figure 4.42.

Figure 4.41 shows a landscape classification for each reprojected area.

Table 4.1: Proportion of Bakara area classified to each landform element
landform Ag ALOS Copernicus SRTM
canyon 0.014629 0.022248 0.015117 0.00340
midslope drainage 0.016231 0.019541 0.016481 0.00162
upland drainage 0.000013 0.000022 0.000022
u-shaped valley 0.066413 0.068064 0.070565 0.03232
plains 0.773198 0.754703 0.761839 0.91754
open slopes 0.010012 0.011735 0.011372
upper slopes 0.082147 0.083463 0.085914 0.04047
local ridges 0.000022 0.000031 0.000018
midslopes ridges 0.016486 0.019711 0.016732 0.00072
mountain tops 0.020848 0.020481 0.021939 0.00391


Figure 4.41: Categorical representation of Bakara

Proportion of categorised Bakara area in each of several classification classes

Figure 4.42: Proportion of categorised Bakara area in each of several classification classes